Picture 053

2016 Ford Fusion 2.5 SE (USA)

 photo Picture 064_zpspdvph1sz.jpg  photo Picture 051_zpspnqrloe2.jpg  photo Picture 055_zpsadfuh2kv.jpg  photo Picture 053_zpstjayxw9e.jpg
 photo Picture 062_zpsxhm1h8bt.jpg  photo Picture 065_zpsbdxh1ygu.jpg  photo Picture 058_zpstrg09kda.jpg  photo Picture 025_zpsz0jk7hk3.jpg  photo Picture 056_zpsi65xsf22.jpg  photo Picture 057_zps7l3et1mz.jpg
 photo Picture 036_zpsbu4dstkd.jpg  photo Picture 034_zpss7gi2lg1.jpg  photo Picture 035_zps8imx7ss9.jpg  photo Picture 014_zpstnjsgca4.jpg
 photo Picture 011_zps1avheym4.jpg  photo Picture 038_zps7la7bv6w.jpg  photo Picture 032_zpsy4scmdzv.jpg  photo Picture 045_zpsnql0uaz4.jpg
 photo Picture 019_zpsle48ecok.jpg  photo Picture 018_zpsja1tkxo1.jpg  photo Picture 030_zpsupeef4ru.jpg  photo Picture 050_zpshtsbxebj.jpg
 photo Picture 044_zpsq0ktcvh5.jpg  photo Picture 043_zpsxcpwamsd.jpg  photo Picture 031_zpsfrspmj9i.jpg  photo Picture 041_zpsj3ycs8pu.jpg
 photo Picture 049_zpsssbugo1v.jpg  photo Picture 039_zpsqgz9n8vq.jpg  photo Picture 046_zpsfc6l7o8v.jpg  photo Picture 042_zpshmfde18m.jpg  photo Picture 047_zps9klxjcnu.jpg  photo Picture 061_zpsgskogbcs.jpg
Quite who coined the phrase “Mondeo Man” is lost in the mists of time, but we do know that it started to be used in the mid-1990s at a time when New Labour was trying to build a campaign to come to power in the UK and end the series of Conservative governments that had been in place since 1979. The Mondeo was launched in early 1993 and it was an absolute revelation compared to the aged Sierra which it replaced. Whilst the Sierra had sold strongly in the UK throughout its life, it had never enjoyed the success of its predecessor, a car which dominated the UK Sales Charts throughout the 1970s, sold in over 150,000 examples in a single year (1979), a feat never achieved before or since on the UK market. By the late 1980s, there was far more competition, with Vauxhall’s Cavalier having emerged in a new third style in 1988, Austin-Rover building well equipped Montegos properly (most of the time!), and the driver’s car to beat, the Peugeot 405 being made in Ryton and thus counting as a British Car in the eyes of the ultra-conservative but all important Fleet Managers. The first Mondeo blew them all away, and so it became very much the car of the moment, for family use out of working hours and for business use during the day. But not for long. Despite what all the political rhetoric was saying, there was no denying that we were, or at least we thought we were, getting more affluent, and a car with a Ford (or some other volume brand) badge on it was no longer good enough for many, who found the means of getting behind the wheel of something a little more premium. That the second generation Mondeo, launched in 2000,  was probably even better than the first relative to its competitors, mattered little, as sales started an inexorable slide, first out of the Top 10, and then by the time of the launch of the third generation car in 2007, even out of the Top 20. No amount of pre-launch publicity courtesy of pretty blatant product placement in the latest James Bond movie, or good reviews from the motoring press could persuade the badge snobs out of their 3 Series, Audi A4s and C Classes. So what does that have to do with the subject of this test carried out in the US on a car whose name was used in Europe on a jacked-up Fiesta beloved of the superannuated? The answer is that there was no way of making the business case work to build a fourth generation Mondeo for Europe, and yet D-Segment Saloons and Estate do still bring in good revenue and profit, so Ford’s only option was to “go global”. Of course, they’d tried this before. Indeed the name “Mondeo” was supposed to signify just that. But when the North American cars appeared, they had been, well, Americanised, emerging as the Ford Contour and Mercury Mystique. On a different planet compared to the Ford Tempo and Mercury Topaz which they replaced (the Tempo is probably the worst car I’ve ever driven), they bombed in America, as they were “too small”. Ford did not replace them, leaving a gap in their range, and focusing on the big-selling if no longer quite so dominant Taurus, in the early part of the 21st Century. When the replacement for that car, the Five Hundred, came out even larger, it left too big a gap underneath it, which was plugged in 2005 by trio of neatly styled mid-sized cars, the Ford Fusion, Mercury Milan and Lincoln Zephyr. Aimed directly at the Toyota Camry, Honda Accord, Mazda 6 and a whole slew of domestic competitors, the new Ford products hit the bull’s eye straight away. They were excellent cars, and whilst they did not succeed in knocking the Camry and Accord off their sales perches, the Fusion became Ford’s best-selling car in the USA, a position it has had ever since. Its success meant that Ford was confident enough in giving the American team the brief to design a replacement not just for the Fusion (the Milan having disappeared when the Mercury brand  was killed off) and Lincoln MKZ (the name the Zephyr had adopted as part of Lincoln’s confusing renaming policy), but also the Mondeo. The results were first seen at the 2012 North American International Auto Show in Detroit where the car was presented as a 2013 model. It went on sale in October 2012 and quickly found favour with both the press and buyers. Sales of this second generation car have averaged around 300,000 a year, an increase of around 50,000 compared to the previous model. US market cars are made in the US and Mexico whereas those for sale in Europe are made there. There was something of a hiatus in getting the Mondeo version to market, as Ford decided to close the Genk plant where it would have been built and it took a couple of years before they had the capacity in Valencia instead. That meant that it was second quarter 2015 before European buyers could try the car, some three years after it had first been seen. Although Mondeo and Fusion look very similar, there are quite a lot of differences, reflecting the different tastes, buyer priorities and fiscal regimes of the two continents.

 photo Picture 054_zpsgq6gmeu2.jpg  photo Picture 060_zpsu5jzbdc2.jpg  photo Picture 052_zpsszocik2x.jpg  photo Picture 027_zpsesd6ns1y.jpg  photo Picture 048_zpsomgsmiha.jpg  photo Picture 022_zps5d0kwtww.jpg

I’ve been trying to get hold of a Fusion ever since the cars hit US streets. Hertz had a small number of them right from launch, but they always seemed so popular that whenever I saw one parked up, it had already been allocated to someone else. That was clearly a good sign that it was worth persisting. Finally, my luck was in and when wandering a facility packed with cars, I found quite a few of them parked up, though I have to observe that from the rear the Fusion bears an uncanny resemblance to the latest Hyundai Sonata and a good few of those fooled me into thinking that there were some Fusions in more interesting colours than Grey. The best I could do was one in Ingot Silver, but it was almost new with only 4400 miles on the clock. I took it, eagerly anticipating what should prove to be one of the stars of its highly competitive class.

 photo Picture 059_zpse9qktapd.jpg  photo Picture 016_zpsy2rdp0ce.jpg  photo Picture 063_zpsblsbwcjg.jpg  photo Picture 024_zpstdd62559.jpg

The engine line-up for the Fusion is very different from the Mondeo. No diesels here, but a choice of three petrols, a Hybrid and a plug-in hybrid electric model, the Energi. There was one of the Hybrid versions at Hertz when I collected this one, but it was allocated, so sampling that will be for another day. With no Ecoboost badged cars in sight – and Ford offer you the 1.5 litre turbo which puts out 181 bhp or the more potent 2 litre 231 bhp unit – my test car was the entry level 2.5 litre 4 cylinder version. It puts out 175 bhp which is absolutely in the middle of the list of power outputs among its rivals. The test car came coupled with a six speed automatic gearbox. It is not a happy combination.  I think the bigger problem is the gearbox which seemed dim-witted, unable to decide that it needed to change down a gear or two, with the result that the car struggled to pick-up or even maintain speed when climbing even a gentle incline or if baulked in traffic. On the canyon roads in the hills above Malibu it was particularly frustrating. I tried putting it in Sport mode as opposed to Drive, and this made precious little difference. When you do get some life out of the engine, you realise that it is not aurally a particularly endearing experience. It is not particularly loud, unless you really rev the engine hard, and it is still decently smooth, but this engine is going to win no prizes. It is a carry-over from the old model Fusion, where I don’t remember it being as off the pace as this. No wonder Ford put far more emphasis on the Ecoboost models. It does at least deliver decent economy, though. I covered 335 miles in the test car in a mixture of driving from the morning queues from the LAX airport up to Santa Monica and Malibu, the challenging canyon roads which combine moderate gradients with plenty of tight bends heading over the Malibu hills and into the valley, and then a long freeway haul east out towards the Palm Springs area, and at the end of it all, the trip computer, and backed up by my calculations, said 30.8 mpg US, which is 36.8 mpg Imperial, a very creditable figure for a large family saloon. My expectations were that this would be a good car to take on those twisty roads, as it should come with Ford’s legendary excellence in steering feel and handling. Indeed, all the (US) reviews of the Fusion praise its sporty handling. I have to say that I was disappointed. Not because the Fusion is bad in this regard, like a Toyota Camry is. As it certainly is not. It is just that I was expecting better. There’s some feel to the steering, which is of course far better than a lot of cars manage, such as the Toyota Avensis that I had driven in the UK the day before, but if you think this is anywhere close to the standards of say the second generation Mondeo, prepare yourself now for the fact that it is not. There is a decent linear progression of feel as you turn the wheel more, and the car does corner well, with minimal body roll and understeer well tamed, perhaps because the gearbox will ensure you are not in the right gear and going fast enough to get into trouble! But an attribute that bests the class? No, not there.  The Fusion does ride well, though, and on California’s poorly maintained roads, where you encounter everything from concrete ridges to gigantic crater-sized pot holes as well as some decently surfaced tarmac, that is all to the good. With low noise levels when cruising at a steady speed, it makes the Fusion a relaxed long distance companion.  The brakes needed a fairly firm push with a dead bit of travel initially before anything happened, but then they proved well up to their task. There is an electronic handbrake, operated by a small button in the centre console to the rear of the gear lever. Visibility is a mixed bag. The door mirrors have a second piece in the upper outer corners which do an excellent job at covering any blind spot. It is behind you where things get tricky, as the steeply angled rear screen means that you have no idea where the back of the Ford is. Luckily, and perhaps a tacit admission of this, there is a back-up camera fitted, projecting an image onto the Infotainment screen, so there is no real problem in manoeuvering the car in tight spots.

 photo Picture 008_zpsi1kcdngd.jpg  photo Picture 017_zpspgrhjq1p.jpg  photo Picture 015_zps1cye10ca.jpg  photo Picture 020_zpsg9nkt3ze.jpg  photo Picture 026_zpspxeaishd.jpg  photo Picture 028_zpsje4e8x6f.jpg photo Picture 033_zpsziqxgxc6.jpg  photo Picture 029_zpsfgwyeecy.jpg

Inside, it is clear that the US team have done a better job than the European ones who give us the mess that is the current Focus. There’s a nice cohesive design, and a good choice of materials so the initial impression is that this is among the better interiors of its rivals, where standards are constantly improving. The seat trim and main mouldings were black, but there is judicious use of dark grey inlays and a piano black inset around the gearlever which look far better than the fake wood or cheap silver plastic that have afflicted many recent Blue Oval products. Look a bit closer, though, and the good feelings diminish a bit, as there are still an awful lot of small and fiddly buttons in the centre of the dash. The basics are right, though. There are two large dials under a single cowl, with clear markings and turquoise coloured pointers, with rev counter on the left and speedo on the right, and smaller gauges for water temperature and fuel level inset into the lower segment of these, respectively. Between the dials is the digital display area which you can customise by dint of the array of buttons on the left spoke of the steering wheel. These cover everything from trip distance and average fuel economy to changing various vehicle settings or showing what is playing on the audio system. Twin column stalks operate indicators and wipers, and the lights function from a rotary dial on the dash to the left of the wheel. It is the middle of the dash where the design has its problems. There is a small integrated display screen for the Infotainment system. On this version it is not touch sensitive, so that means lots of buttons. To its left are the ones for the screen and its set up and to the right is the equivalent of a phone key pad. Underneath it are a vast array of buttons and knobs for the audio unit and under this are another array of buttons for the air conditioning set up. I never did discover if you can display any of this last on the screen, but as this is air conditioning and not automated climate control, I doubt it. It proved reasonably intuitive, and once you are familiar with it, would doubtless not be an issue, but for the first few minutes, it looked far too complicated and most of the buttons are very small making them hard to stab at in a hurry. The button fest continues on the steering wheel boss, as there are an array of them set in the sides of the lower spokes for cruise control. Those on the right spoke are for audio control repeater functions. The wheel itself is a plastic moulding, but it was one of the better ones, not unpleasant to hold.

 photo Picture 001_zpszsheronp.jpg  photo Picture 004_zpspxtu2ezf.jpg  photo Picture 007_zpsnzdzyq53.jpg  photo Picture 006_zps1eq0ggqz.jpg  photo Picture 005_zpsq7is4h4x.jpg  photo Picture 010_zpszhrvded1.jpg photo Picture 023_zpsc4o62z8p.jpg

Slightly surprisingly for the volume selling and near to base model in this class, seat adjustment for the driver and front passenger was electric, with switches on the side of the seat, where you will also find a lumbar support. The steering wheel telescopes in/out as well as up/down, so getting the perfect driving position was not hard. What was difficult, though, was getting comfortable. It felt to me as if the shape of the seats themselves was not quite right, with too little padding in both the cushion and the backrest. It is rare these days to find a car seat in which you cannot feel comfortable but this was one. Clearly all my test mileage was done from the driver’s seat, so I can only comment on the rear seats based on sitting in them as a quick test. There’s certainly no shortage of space, with ample leg room even if the front seat is set well back. With it set for my driving position, there is masses of space. Width across the car is not an issue, either and despite the sloping roofline, my head was some way off touch the headlining. There is a drop down central armrest which has twin cupholders in is upper face. Rear seat passengers also get a pair of rear vents and there are map pockets on the back of the front seats. Indeed, there are plenty of places to put things inside the cabin, with a generous split level glovebox, a large area in front of the gear lever, almost Volvo-esque in its difficulty of access, a cubby under the central armrest and modest door bins. The boot is a good size, being particularly long from front to back, though the opening is fairly narrow, so this might dictate what you could get in there. There is a bit of space around the space saver under the boot floor for odds and ends. The rear seat backrests are split and fold forwards, released from inside the car.

 photo Picture 002_zps168tjxkt.jpg  photo Picture 003_zps5zmnxrtz.jpg  photo Picture 009_zpsx9tsm3g1.jpg  photo Picture 021_zps9x0eeaiy.jpg

US buyers get a choice of three trim levels; S, SE and Titanium. The last of these has the 2 litre Ecoboost engine as standard, whilst this is an option on the SE, as is the less powerful 1.5 version. The S trim only comes with the 2.5 litre 4 cylinder engine. S and SE models have a six speed automatic gearbox as standard, whilst the Titanium has a CVT ‘box. SE and Titanium models are also available optionally with All Wheel Drive. 2016 pricing for an S starts at $22,600, and it is not quite as basic as you might fear, with the standard spec including 16″ alloys, body coloured door handles, lower sills in black, solar tinted glass, an alarm and anti-theft system, a backup camera, cruise control, auto headlights, air conditioning, remote boot release, one touch power operated front windows, and Ford’s MySync system with a colour display screen, voice activation including an audio unit with AM/FM radio, single slot CD, MP3 and AUX slot and wheel mounted repeater controls, along with the Ford Message Centre. It costs another $1570 to jump to the SE, which brings with it 17″ alloy wheels, the SecuriCode keyless entry system, a rear centre armrest, 6 speakers and XM Satellite radio, heated mirrors with puddle lights and integrated turn signals, and power adjustable front seats, 10 way for the driver and 6 way for the passenger, a compass, an exterior temperature sensor, rear seat power outlets and air vents. The Titanium is a lot more costly at $31,120 for a front wheel drive car, but as well as the more powerful 2 litre Turbo engine you are also getting lower profile tyres on 17″ rims, dual bright exhaust tips, a leather wrapped steering wheel, rear parking sensors, keyless starting, a mirror memory, an upgraded premium sound system, dual zone automated climate control, leather seat trim with heated driver’s seat and a seat memory,  All three trims are available with the Hybrid engine and SE and Titanium models are available in the plug-in electric hybrid  Energi version.

 photo Picture 040_zps7zzdc9j5.jpg  photo Picture 037_zps1pu6xe2a.jpg  photo Picture 013_zps4vsoptbc.jpg  photo Picture 012_zpsabvbjqbn.jpg

My expectations were very high for the Fusion, and it is fair to say that I was a little disappointed. It’s not a bad car. Indeed, far from it, it is, in most respects, a very able machine. But having sampled most of its US market competitors, which with the notable example of the best-selling Camry, are all very good, given that the Ford is often placed at or near the top of the comparisons, then I was expecting it to be really very special. And it was not. I think the combination of engine and gearbox were the elements that frustrated the most. Give it the Ecoboost engine, even the one with only another 6 bhp, and things may well be better. Perhaps I should have expected that the venerable 2.5 litre engine, which was not the strongest aspect of the old model, it has to be said, would prove to be the weakest link. That the steering and handling were not as class-supreme as everyone would have you believe was more of a surprise, and a disappointment. Not that they were not still good, and for anyone who has to put with the feel-less and soggy Camry, nothing short of a revelation, but I still remember the second generation Mondeo and this was not even close to as feelsome as that model was. In all other respects, the Fusion impressed, offering plenty of space and comfort, a decent level of equipment and even a Ford MySync system that did not have me cursing as much as sometimes has been the case. Before I’d driven this car, I was pretty sure that the Fusion was a Top Three of US market family sized saloons. And it probably is, easily beating the Camry, not quite so readily seeing off the Nissan Altima, recently superceded Chevy Malibu, the rather bland Subaru Legacy, the commodious US market Passat and the Chrysler 200. I’ve not yet tried the latest Hyundai Sonata and Kia Optima and would expect them to put up quite a fight for class supremacy, so they join the Ford in the fight for the title. I suspect that the Korean duo don’t quite make it, and frankly nor does the Fusion, which I don’t think is quite the best in class. Although I’ve not driven one on American soil, and Hertz US don’t, for some inexplicable reason, seem to stock them, I was so impressed by the Mazda 6 that I reckon it is the family car that the driver can enjoy at least as much as the passengers. It would be my choice. But if there’s not one available, then the Ford is in with a shout. I am going to see if I can find an Ecoboost one to see if that changes my opinion in the Blue Oval’s favour.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *