2018 Cadillac ATS 2.0 T Premium (USA)

 photo Picture 071_zps4pcy0yaj.jpg  photo Picture 072_zpsw5y6wlz3.jpg  photo Picture 079_zpslbrbbef5.jpg  photo Picture 077_zpscqhxz3zn.jpg  photo Picture 075_zpss8qnonxn.jpg photo Picture 073_zpsizkcwh1g.jpg  photo Picture 081_zpsa49yg7p9.jpg  photo Picture 133_zpshs5jvtuf.jpg  photo Picture 049_zps9nvwtqpf.jpg  photo Picture 051_zpszjxiba7d.jpg
 photo Picture 042_zpsrbga82gv.jpg  photo Picture 044_zpswcuxx07p.jpg  photo Picture 041_zpsyccajmhp.jpg  photo Picture 038_zpspguoujnp.jpg  photo Picture 052_zpsrrgcdjgw.jpg  photo Picture 047_zpse2pniecw.jpg
 photo Picture 112_zpsm8et429s.jpg  photo Picture 018_zpsggjmdu1v.jpg  photo Picture 015_zpssttmb9kb.jpg  photo Picture 014_zpsmdq40py8.jpg  photo Picture 020_zpsaaoavo2a.jpg photo Picture 021_zps7ouvcacu.jpg  photo Picture 121_zpsfj5ntu7v.jpg  photo Picture 119_zpsuvlgx1o3.jpg  photo Picture 123_zpshx6cco4x.jpg  photo Picture 114_zpskrmfdqpm.jpg photo Picture 103_zpssphnoa1g.jpg  photo Picture 122_zpskm3sk7sy.jpg  photo Picture 111_zpsqqp6uytv.jpg  photo Picture 113_zpsidmqanzg.jpg  photo Picture 102_zpsxvrrpjbt.jpg
 photo Picture 036_zpssq8rmtwf.jpg  photo Picture 056_zpsb0a6s4zv.jpg  photo Picture 060_zpsmledlw5l.jpg  photo Picture 083_zpsoc3h8ik8.jpg  photo Picture 082_zps9fjk2x2b.jpg  photo Picture 055_zpsakd7v7wl.jpg
 photo Picture 106_zpspccogkns.jpg  photo Picture 063_zpsi8695q0a.jpg  photo Picture 066_zpszjlqaqo1.jpg  photo Picture 070_zps09tzbgw0.jpg  photo Picture 095_zpscuruuhev.jpg
The market may have shifted strongly in favour of SUVs and Crossovers, but to focus solely on this genre would still be missing a huge potential sales volume, as other trends over recent years also indicate the priorities in customers’ minds and hence their wallets. A significant one is to the premium brands in favour of the ones which have traditionally dominated the market. All the big names here have become much bigger as they have not just broadened their product portfolios, but extended them downwards to smaller, and (relatively) cheaper cars. Audi did it with the A3, a premium hatch that took the market by storm and must have made it much easier for BMW management to sign off the 1 Series and Mercedes the A Class. So when you are America’s most prestigious or even premium brand, looking at how to grow, then whilst the SRX Crossover was one way of finding additional sales, when your smallest and cheapest product, the CTS, is the size of a BMW 5 Series, it cannot have been all that hard to decide to build something a little smaller. And as Cadillac is part of the vast General Motors empire, there would even have been access to the requisite bits you cannot see, like the platform and engines, that would offer the necessary financial benefits to allow for a car which was perhaps never going to sell in the same volumes as the BMW 3 Series, Audi A4 and Mercedes C Class, to be profitable. The result was the ATS, which was launched in January 2012, at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit, going on sale in North America later that year, as a 2013 model year car, and then being offered to China and other global markets. With sales of its competitors reaching vast numbers per year, in a sector of the market which was still growing, this looked like the car that Cadillac needed for yet another of its much vaunted brand renaissances.

 photo Picture 030_zpswmgdfzza.jpg  photo Picture 090_zpsog2pwtas.jpg  photo Picture 084_zpszegpduzl.jpg  photo Picture 027_zpsv9lneavr.jpg  photo Picture 088_zpsykx48k8q.jpg  photo Picture 022_zpslzpvqkny.jpg  photo Picture 019_zpsbeougsnr.jpg  photo Picture 085_zpsithg94w9.jpg  photo Picture 017_zpsxfnzekmb.jpg  photo Picture 086_zpsknsqvcuc.jpg  photo Picture 013_zpsn1qld8wh.jpg  photo Picture 089_zpsuy9na9vn.jpg

Cadillac concluded that building the ATS on a cut-down version of the platform that underpinned the second generation CTS was not the right answer, as this would be too heavy, and so they built a new one, the Alpha Platform, which also sees service in the second generation Camaro. This means rear wheel drive, which was clearly something that seemed important if the cars you are going to compete with are also (mostly) configured that way, and it made the offer of an all-wheel drive model – something that is important for the snow-belt States, easy to engineer, and the target of close to 50/50 weight distribution was achieved. There was a strong family resemblance in the styling to the larger CTS, again, something which is a feature of the German rivals, whose products can be hard to tell apart at a quick glance. Certainly, in the early days the ATS and CTS looked very similar, though when the latter was updated in 2014, its new styling was more clearly differentiated from its smaller brother. The initial reviews of the ATS were very positive The US press loved it, and went into that sort of journalistic hyperbole about how this was the car that finally beat the Germans at their own game. Always sceptical of such articles, which seem to be a combination of a quest for attention-grabbing headlines and misplaced nationalistic short-sightedness, I clearly wanted to try the car for myself. Hertz did have some on fleet within a few months of the late 2012 on-sale date, but they never seemed to be available, and then they all vanished. On arriving in Phoenix, though, I noted that there were quite a few brand new cars parked up, and these turned out to be 2018 model year cars. I was able to secure one, at no extra cost from my reservation for a humble mid-sized car, thanks to the new Ultimate Choice program. It had covered just over 500 miles in the week it had been on fleet, and still had that distinctive new car smell to it.

 photo Picture 035_zpswyv4gkrz.jpg  photo Picture 094_zpslxs680w3.jpg  photo Picture 117_zpshijabyek.jpg  photo Picture 096_zpsyseosmkm.jpg  photo Picture 093_zpshnkbrprn.jpg  photo Picture 040_zpsbfyszid5.jpg  photo Picture 128_zpsrmzvxutw.jpg  photo Picture 099_zpsj3pguvmu.jpg  photo Picture 033_zpsdxflbsoa.jpg  photo Picture 097_zpswuopcmvy.jpg  photo Picture 101_zpscjoqsl1s.jpg  photo Picture 126_zps3musagoq.jpg

There’s a choice of engines in the ATS. The entry level unit is a 2 litre turbo, developing 272 bhp, and this was the one fitted to the test car. It turned out to be one of the ATS’ stronger points. Although never going to win many prizes for its soundtrack, it proved very willing, smooth and refined, endowing the Cadillac with impressive levels of acceleration from any speed. Coupled to an 8 speed automatic, which made completely seamless gearchanges, the ATS could gather momentum very rapidly, and then hold a freeway cruise at low revs and hence low levels of noise. The engine only sounded coarse if you really revved it hard, but frankly, you would be unlikely to do that very often, as there is sufficient torque to mean that an early-ish gearchange will still give you the acceleration you need. I was slightly surprised to find that the test car had a Stop/Start system in it, and that it was switched on – clearly Cadillac have been studying the Europeans! The ATS consumed 9.25 gallons over a test distance of 257 miles, which computes to a very respectable 27.78 mpg US or 33.19 mpg Imperial.

 photo Picture 008_zpswrqg1hcq.jpg  photo Picture 127_zpsx0uicpdh.jpg  photo Picture 134_zps70v39vul.jpg  photo Picture 124_zpsv32xwoa0.jpg  photo Picture 107_zpshlydbqii.jpg photo Picture 091_zpsm42g1xi1.jpg  photo Picture 053_zpsusqq9mkr.jpg  photo Picture 059_zpsuwdjab00.jpg  photo Picture 057_zpshqhp7hui.jpg  photo Picture 098_zpsachywrlm.jpg

Cadillac presented the ATS as a European-style sports sedan, claiming that it would drive like a 3 Series or an A4. They are not far off the truth here. It probably is not going to be as good if you were to take it to the track, but on ordinary roads, it acquitted itself pretty well. The steering is well judged. There is plenty of feel, and the weighting is about right. The car corners neatly, with no body roll and not much in the way of understeer, and it rides well on Arizona’s smooth roads. It stops well, too. The foot operated parking brake does perhaps betray its American, as opposed to European origins. Truly this is an American car that is good to drive, with quite a sporty feel to it, but without expecting the driver and passengers to trade that off with compromises in comfort. It scores less well for visibility. Biggest culprit are the door mirrors, which are small, and have too limited a field of view, meaning that there was a huge blind spot which you needed to remember on the freeways. A rear-view camera was useful, as the steeply sloping rear screen meant you could not tell where the back of the car was, although the stubby tail did mean that there was typically more clearance than you thought.

 photo Picture 016_zps80yngziq.jpg  photo Picture 092_zpsunlnotti.jpg  photo Picture 058_zpsbegse5qz.jpg  photo Picture 062_zpsfslebirq.jpg  photo Picture 116_zpsy1poyrpy.jpg photo Picture 012_zps3kgvgdyw.jpg  photo Picture 046_zpszx5idjvu.jpg  photo Picture 034_zpsjeddtbcu.jpg  photo Picture 024_zpsusv5wn3z.jpg  photo Picture 115_zps2q0hnvjg.jpg

There are two schools of thought on the interior style of the modern Cadillac. The US press have generally gushed with praise on how “upscale” they are, whereas my view (and I am far from alone in thinking this) is that the combination of a vast number of materials, textures and colours, with lots of pale-coloured shiny plastic pretending to be wood is just a bit tawdry. Thankfully, the one in the ATS was much better than this. Indeed, at a glance, it looked like it really was conceived along similar lines to the cars that it competes against. The interior trim of my car was black, and that meant that the dashboard and door casings were all black, with plenty of stitched leather trim on the larger surfaces along with decent looking, and feeling plastics, all of which does lift the quality levels somewhat. There are metal highlight rings which work well in providing some colour contrast. Gloss black inlays featured around the central display screen and in swathes on the steering wheel. As well as presenting the photographers with challenges from the reflections and light patches that showed in them, the real issue was just how quickly fingermarks appeared on any of these areas that were touched. And around the screen, which I will come to, you do touch things quite a lot (unless you want to use the voice recognition, but that’s another chapter of problems!). The main instruments are all digital, so when you get in the car, there is a black panel, which first says “Cadillac” as you press the keyless Start button to fire the ignition. As well as the expected dials for speedo and rev counter and gauges for fuel level and water temperature, there are three data display areas across the bottom, one of which contains the odometer. The others contain what you want them to show from various menus, which you select using some of the buttons on the right hand steering wheel spoke. You can also change the radio channel this way, even if you did not want to. The dials were easy to read with very crisp graphics. That steering wheel did look a bit overloaded with buttons, as the cruise control is also there. Column stalks are clearly from the GM parts bin, and they are the ones with the serrated surface near their ends. The centre of the dash contains the touch sensitive colour display screen for the CUE system, sitting between two vertically stacked air vents. Although CUE is a bit better than it was, I still found it frustrating. You have to use it for many of the functions that previously would have been the simple press of a button, so switching from say FM to Satellite XM radio required you to press one button to change waveband, then to scroll through the list to find the one you wanted, by repeatedly pressing the forward button. The system was sometimes slow to respond, and at times, when I pressed the “home” button, it simply did nothing at all. The whole unit also felt a bit loose in the car, even though it was firmly attached and did not rattle or anything. Under it are a series of touchpads for the dual zone climate control system. Whilst the overall effect is to make the interior look a bit simpler and less button laden, it is clear that Cadillac still have some way to go to meet the standards of usability set by the German rivals.

 photo Picture 004_zpsee5im8ec.jpg  photo Picture 005_zpsd8xmlzep.jpg  photo Picture 135_zpsmn6lde5j.jpg  photo Picture 132_zpskzqp47sh.jpg  photo Picture 136_zpszajvmmbu.jpg photo Picture 007_zpsxye12aw1.jpg  photo Picture 009_zps53ohz4on.jpg  photo Picture 001_zpslbw38vvy.jpg  photo Picture 029_zpsg2p04huq.jpg  photo Picture 054_zpsdszbmrnu.jpg

There were no issues in getting comfortable. The seats are electrically adjusted, with a series of buttons on the seat side, and there are two memory settings on the door, to allow you to store your chosen position once you’ve found it. Steering column adjustment was manual, with a rather stiff lever buried to the left hand side of the column, but with the wheel telescoping in/out as well as up/down, I could easily get things set up the way I wanted them. The seats were trimmed with a nice soft leather, and proved comfortable, something I appreciated when sat on them for far longer than anticipated thanks to a long delay on the I10 freeway following an accident. My only complaint concerns the seat belts. There is no height adjuster to their mounting, and they were set far too low for me. This seemed a surprising omission especially, when I found the feature on the bargain-basement Kia Rio that I would be driving the following day.

 photo Picture 076_zpsogmip0to.jpg  photo Picture 065_zpsfazvmpga.jpg  photo Picture 109_zpsakopsdn7.jpg  photo Picture 067_zps26zbcrl4.jpg  photo Picture 069_zps2k98zygi.jpg  photo Picture 104_zpsgzxkksi2.jpg  photo Picture 110_zps4siwhc1m.jpg  photo Picture 100_zps36z2dalc.jpg  photo Picture 011_zpsmvatjced.jpg  photo Picture 105_zpsqj8jkoal.jpg  photo Picture 131_zpsqcm3t2mt.jpg  photo Picture 037_zps1wg2t00z.jpg

Those in the back of the ATS may not be quite so content. Space here is a bit tight. Set the front seats well back, and leg and knee room is limited. Whilst there is probably ample width across the seat for three occupants, there is a fairly sizeable transmission tunnel, and the central console unit protrudes well back, so the middle seat passenger would have to sit with their legs astride this. Headroom proved adequate, despite the slightly sloping rear roofline. There is a drop down armrest which has two cupholders and a lidded cubby on its upper surface. Occupants here also get bins on the doors and map pockets in the seat backs, for their odds and ends. There are air vents in the rear face of that central cubby unit.

 photo Picture 003_zps8dhgayyo.jpg  photo Picture 002_zpsqfccexcu.jpg  photo Picture 129_zpsiptpdyrz.jpg  photo Picture 130_zpspu56hvwc.jpg  photo Picture 031_zpsvmkykp4j.jpg photo Picture 028_zps8lunwfjl.jpg  photo Picture 023_zpsw1rphulq.jpg  photo Picture 045_zpsgbbwejki.jpg  photo Picture 010_zpsttdhhhqr.jpg  photo Picture 125_zps1sjeea8b.jpg

As you might expect from the short tail, the boot is not massive, being somewhat smaller than that of its main rivals. It is surprisingly long from front to back, but is quite shallow and the floor is not completely flat across the width of the car, though, with raised areas at either side. There are stowage wells at the very side, and there is space under the floor around the spacesaver for a few bits and pieces. The rear seat backrests can be folded forward for extra load length and there is also a ski flap through the central armrest. Up front, there is a reasonable sized glovebox, bins on the doors, and a cubby under the central armrest. I was a little surprised to see that the two cupholders in the central console did not have a sliding cover, something I would rather have expected to see.

 photo Picture 006_zpsq7nmxfig.jpg  photo Picture 064_zpsejxpxnda.jpg  photo Picture 025_zpsl2yr6ndn.jpg  photo Picture 043_zpsgab7odof.jpg  photo Picture 061_zpsvzn9q1h3.jpg photo Picture 068_zps6liwpmpb.jpg  photo Picture 048_zpsdwnfl5po.jpg  photo Picture 032_zpszgyslobk.jpg

Although the ATS range is nothing like as extensive as those of the dread German rivals, there are plenty of versions to choose from. There are also two body styles: a four door saloon as tested here and a 2 door coupe. There are ATS-V versions of both with thunderous 464 bhp twin turbo 3.6 litre V6 engines, and a range of other mechanical enhancements aimed at rivalling the M3/4, C63 AMGs and the RS5 Audi. Lower down, you get a choice of two engines: the 2 litre turbo as tested here or a 335 bhp 3.6 litre V6. The previous entry level 2,5 litre unit was deleted at the end of 2016. There is a further choice of rear or all-wheel drive. And then there are trim levels. Start point is the base Cadillac ATS, which has the 2 litre turbo, an eight-speed automatic transmission, and rear-wheel drive. Sedan models start at $34,595, and coupe models begin at $37,595. A six-speed manual transmission is a no-cost option. All-wheel drive is available for an extra $2,000 ($2,400 in coupe models). Standard equipment includes an 8″ touch screen, Cadillac’s CUE infotainment system (supporting Apple CarPlay and Android Auto), a rearview camera, Teen Driver assist, Bluetooth, three USB ports, XM satellite radio, a Bose sound system, a Wi-Fi hot spot, OnStar telematics, dual-zone climate control, proximity keyless entry, cruise control, power windows, heated side mirrors, and leatherette upholstery. The ATS Luxury trim adds satellite navigation, front and rear parking sensors, leather upholstery, heated front seats, and a heated steering wheel. Sedan models start at $38,395, and coupe models begin at $41,395. A six-speed manual transmission and all-wheel drive are available. Options include a Safety and Security package, which adds forward collision warning, lane keep assist, lane departure warning, blind spot monitoring, rear cross traffic alert, and rain-sensing wipers. It costs $1,850 in sedan models and $1,500 in coupes. The ATS Premium Luxury trim includes the 3.6-litre 335 bhp V6, an eight-speed automatic transmission, and rear-wheel drive. All-wheel drive is optional, though a manual transmission is not. Sedan prices start at $43,995 and coupes at $46,995. Standard equipment includes forward collision warning, lane keep assist, lane departure warning, blind spot monitoring, rear cross traffic alert, rain-sensing wipers, automatic on/off high beam headlights, and a sunroof. Options include a Driver Assist package ($2,150 sedan; $1,900 coupe), which adds adaptive cruise control, front and rear automatic emergency braking, and a head-up display. The ATS Premium Performance trim adds the Magnetic Ride Control adaptive suspension, a limited-slip rear differential, and a head-up display. Only the eight-speed automatic and rear-wheel drive are offered. Sedans are priced at $46,995 and coupes at $49,495. The Driver Assist package is still optional, but at a lower $1,300. At the top of the range is the Cadillac ATS-V, which packs a twin-turbocharged 3.6-litre V6 which puts out 464 bhp, a six-speed manual transmission, and rear-wheel drive. The eight-speed automatic is a $2,000 option. Sedan prices start at $60,695 and coupes at $62,895. Standard equipment includes a tuned Magnetic Ride Control suspension, active noise cancellation, high-performance brakes, a quad exhaust, and an uprated engine cooling system. Notably, a number of features are not standard in this trim. Surprisingly, satellite navigation ($1,350) as well as the Safety and Security package ($1,850 sedan; $1,500 coupe) are options.

 photo Picture 039_zps9bxy07le.jpg  photo Picture 108_zpso8hqysws.jpg  photo Picture 078_zpsggquvczu.jpg  photo Picture 050_zps7kzvrp3f.jpg  photo Picture 080_zpshz6h2efk.jpg  photo Picture 074_zpsqrcjnjea.jpg

I’ve not seen any recent US press comparison tests which suggest that the ATS is the class leader that they declared at its launch. And if you look at the monthly sales numbers, it is pretty clear that the buying public don’t think it is, either. Sales of the ATS are even lower than those of the larger CTS, and are a fraction of those achieved by its German rivals, even in patriotic America, and they’ve been falling every year since launch. And that is probably right. It is not that the ATS is a bad car, as definitely it isn’t. I quite enjoyed my time with it. But the problem is that the A4 and 3 Series are just that bit more polished. They don’t have display screens that feel wobbly, and they don’t have that wretched CUE system. They drive just that bit better, and they’ve got a bit more space in them. So, the best reason I could think of for buying an ATS is because you simply want something different, something that is not a German car. Of course, there are other models that fit that brief, too: the Jaguar XE and Alfa Giulia, as well as the Infiniti Q50 and Lexus IS and Volvo’s S60. To a European, that means the ATS stands little chance, but in America, it can probably win over some people based on the value for money it offers. Given that the CTS was promoted at one stage as a 5 Series-sized car for 3 Series money, then it looks like the same sort of strategy could apply here. Not perhaps one which is going to maximise the profit margins, but one which will sell some cars. Just not as many as Cadillac probably hoped.

 photo Picture 120_zpsby7wpvva.jpg  photo Picture 118_zpsm9ezhdes.jpg

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *